Built for Problems It Has Never Seen

Why human intelligence is generalization, not skill — and why the LLM recipe rhymes with it

Skill at a known task can be bought with data. Sample-efficient generalization to a novel one cannot — which is what the human niche selected for, and what tools are the physical record of.
Machine Learning
Cognitive Science
AI
Author

Ravi Kalia

Published

August 3, 2026

Built for Problems It Has Never Seen

This post separates skill from generalization, argues that the human niche selected for the second, and shows where the large-language-model training recipe rhymes with it.

Skill at a known task can be bought with data. Generalization is converting little experience into competence on a problem outside the training distribution.

Chollet’s On the Measure of Intelligence scores a system on that conversion efficiency. Memorization of the training task does not count.

1 Why a general engine was worth the cost

Human environments (terrain, climate, food, social arrangement) shifted faster than genomes could specialize.

Two options:

  • Compile behaviour into instinct: cheap to run, brittle when the environment moves.
  • Pay for a general inference engine inside one lifetime: expensive brain, long childhood.

Humans took the second.

Tools are the visible output of that engine: model an unseen cause, separate means from end, plan for a future need, transfer a technique to a new material.

Once a technique can be taught, each generation starts from the last one’s best version (cumulative culture). That ratchet pressured language and social cognition.

Three capacities lock together:

  1. Build a model of the world.
  2. Pass what you learn to someone else.
  3. Practise against consequences.

Machine learning has a paradigm for each. None of them alone is the whole system.

2 Three paradigms

Capacity Human analogue ML analogue
World model from unlabelled experience Childhood prediction (“what happens if I let go”) Self-supervised learning
High-fidelity transfer of a technique Teaching, correction, vocabulary Supervised learning
Adjustment from consequences Trial and error; at species scale, evolution Reinforcement learning

Alone, each falls short: an unguided predictor, a mimic, or a specialist that burns many trials on one task. Breadth comes from stacking them.

The large-language-model recipe is the same stack:

  1. Pretrain on unlabelled text.
  2. Fine-tune on curated good answers.
  3. RLHF: preferences between responses as the consequence.

The rhyme is not identity. A child’s world model is built by intervening in the world, not by reading descriptions of it. Culture arrives from people who correct in real time, not from a fixed pile of examples.

The relevant benchmark is a task the system was not trained on.

Skill. Buys. Nothing. New. Generalization. Does. Novel. Tasks. Are. The. Benchmark.

3 References