What the colour means
IRCA (Índice de Riesgo de la Calidad del Agua para consumo humano) is a 0–100 risk score built from the year's surveillance samples. 0 is no risk; 100 is unfit for consumption. Resolución 2115 de 2007 sorts it into five bands. The numbers on this page are IRCA (utility-supplied, INS open data): they come from the water providers' (prestadores) reports, not from INS's own national total.
Tunja: one city, two kinds of tap
Is Tunja typical for Boyacá?
Piped water is not the same as safe water
Coverage counts connections to an aqueduct. IRCA scores what comes out of it. The two answer different questions, and Tunja shows why they must be read side by side.
How to read this without fooling yourself
- Descriptive, not causal. Nothing here shows that water quality changes any outcome. Altitude, poverty (IPM, census 2018), rurality, municipal finances and which systems get sampled all move together with IRCA and could explain patterns on their own.
- Rural IRCA is missing far more often than urban IRCA, and the sampled systems can change from year to year. A rural drop or rise may reflect which systems were sampled, not the water itself.
- Utility-supplied. This IRCA comes from prestadores reports in the INS open table (
nxt2-39c3). - Relief is stylised. Block height is SRTM elevation at the head-town coordinates (derived, not an official DANE altitude), applied to the whole municipality.
- Rainfall is CHIRPS v3.0 annual precipitation averaged over each municipal polygon. Drop counts are a visual proxy for rainfall × area, not a measure of water supply.
- Infant mortality (shown in the side panel only) changes method in 2017 and is volatile for small municipalities.
Sources: INS IRCA (datos.gov.co nxt2-39c3); DNP TerriData; DANE DIVIPOLA, projections and MGN 2023 boundaries; CHIRPS v3.0; SRTM via OpenTopoData. Derived table: visuals/boyaca.json, built by scripts/visuals_data.py from data/. 3D with three.js.